High-Performance Gas Sensing: Understanding SIL and Functional Safety in Industrial Design
In the highly regulated field of industrial Gas detection, the shift toward quantified reliability is no longer optional. With the integration of the ATEX standard concerning Safety Related Devices into European requirements, product measurement and physical performance must be backed by rigorous functional safety data.
Defining Safety Integrity Level (SIL)
Safety Integrity Level (SIL) defines the relative level of risk reduction provided by a safety function, also specifying the target level of risk reduction; a measurement of performance is required for a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF).
The IEC 61508 standard (Functional Safety of Electrical/ Electronic/ Programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems) provides the global risk-based framework for quantifying safety performance. For the specialised field of Gas detection, this is further refined by EN 50402, which dictates requirements for fixed Gas detection systems.
The Technical Logic of SIL Levels
SIL measures “Functional Safety” through the Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD). It is statistically more precise to express the probability of failure rather than the correct performance. As the SIL level increases, the Risk Reduction Factor (RRF) grows exponentially.
- SIL 1: Standard ATEX-certified devices with regular maintenance.
- SIL 2: Requires self-testing hardware, documented software, and increased robustness. This is the industry standard for high-reliability process plants.
- SIL 3: Achieved through redundancy. If one component fails, the system must remain in a “fail-safe” state.
- SIL 4: Reserved for extreme applications requiring triple redundancy; rarely applied in Gas detection due to complexity and cost.
Why SIL Certification Matters for OEMs
Sensors compliant with IEC 61508 and EN 50402 offer several advantages to their users. As only a handful of impartial, nationally accredited bodies can issue this type of certification, this provides assurance about a supplier’s claim of SIL suitability.
For engineers and instrument manufacturers, using SIL-rated components such as those offered by N.E.T. means reliability calculations are readily available. This significantly reduces lead times for implementing SIL-rated functions in the final product.
The N.E.T. IR Series: Leading the Market in SIL Capability
All N.E.T. Infrared sensors and XIN Detection Heads have a SIL 2 rating, as certified by the Functional Safety Assessment released by TÜV Nord (Registration No. 22 23125). Our sensors are tested in accordance with EN 61508:2010 (Parts 1-7) and EN 50402:2017.
Key technical specifications of our certification include:
- Hardware Capability: SIL 2
- Software Capability: SIL 3
- Redundancy Potential: Two identical N.E.T. modules used in redundancy can reach SIL 3 capability, as the NDIR firmware fully meets SIL 3 requirements.
No other Gas sensor on the market is provided with a higher SIL capability, making our product lineup the ideal choice for designing Gas detection systems aimed at the highest levels of functional safety.
- What is the primary difference between IEC 61508 and EN 50402?
While IEC 61508 provides the general framework for functional safety across all electronic systems, EN 50402 is the specific product standard for fixed Gas detection systems, covering the measurement of combustible, toxic Gases, or Oxygen.
- Does SIL certification replace ATEX certification? ATEX concerns the prevention of explosions in hazardous atmospheres. SIL (Functional Safety) concerns the reliability of the device’s electronic safety functions. Both are required for comprehensive compliance in modern industrial environments. However, in gas detection applications ATEX and SIL ratings are intertwined, as most devices have both markings.
To receive technical documentation or customized support reach out to info@nenvitech.com
